If it gets to 500 copies by early spring it's definitely a no, better to settle for a fun novelty one-off
750? Hmm maybe it’d work annually, but feels iffy
(to be clear: I’m delighted with getting to 320 at this point!)
@mattround I'm still trying to persuade my lad that this was "normal" when I was his age...
“Another, and make it a double!” He said, sliding his glass toward the barman.
“Don’t you think you’ve had enough?”
The question obviously riled the disheveled patron, who locked eyes with the barman.
“My executive team asked me today how we can leverage AI as part of our quantum strategy,” he began. “We don’t even have an asset register.”
“My god. This one’s a triple, and it’s on the house.”
@mhoye I am the only one in the company who sits on the different helpdesk and frontline support group chats. Because that is where I'm gonna hear about us getting breached first. And I need them to be comfortable talking to me. I join the calls occasionally and I tell them my story. And they come to me and you would be surprised what I hear.
On the 4th October, 1936, the British Union of Fascists had planned a march to the East End of London.
Despite the petition of East Londoners, with 100,000 signatures over two days, the Home Office declined to ban the march. Authorities refused to allow a counter-march by the Ex-Servicemen's Movement Against Fascism, because the fascists had organised their march first.
On the day, around 3,000 fascists turned up for the march, protected by more than double that number in police.
The fascists and police were resisted by over ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND anti-fascists who erected barricades, chanting "They Shall Not Pass". Police attempted to dismantle the barricades and clear a path for the fascists, and were pelted with rotten vegetables, and the contents of chamber-pots thrown from upstairs residents.
There's a damn good reason why fascism had a hard time establishing itself in the UK; I'm pretty sure it wasn't the government nor the police.
TL;DR: Major insurers are seeking regulatory approval to exclude AI-related liabilities from corporate policies, citing concerns over the unpredictability of AI models’ outputs as too risky to insure. https://techcrunch.com/2025/11/23/ai-is-too-risky-to-insure-say-people-whose-job-is-insuring-risk/ #law #tech #legaltech ⚖️ 🤖 #autosum
@mattround It's here! It's here!
@anon_opin you... disagreed with how you voted?
Just retrospectively when the crap which was warned about happened/is happening, or even before that?
That is following the logical path of running a bath, getting into the bath, and then complaining that you never agreed to getting wet because the whole bathroom is not filled with water.
@anon_opin
You voted Leave? Idiot.
You think 33% should have a veto over 66%? Idiot.
@anon_opin cunt. You got what you voted for so...
@anon_opin easy dividing line:
fancy-dress is "this kinda thing"
cosplay is "my costume is correct, as per the scene between these two characters which has 0.3s of screentime in the region/language-specific version of the film/episode/cartoon shown once at 4am on a Sunday. that is why my sock is that exact shade of pink, not because of a laundry accident. you know nothing!"
Steve:
frequent overthinker, compulsive fixer, digester-then-explainer, "why?" question relishing father, minor-irritant partner, excessive disassembler, original-form hacker, high-efficiency googler, borderline-competent car-fixer, expert-level car-breaker, faster-by-qwerty communicator, indiscriminate photo-taker, Leatherman owner.